It has been a very long time since I
posted on this blog, due to various reasons, such as lack of sleep or
other activities (e.g., work). I feel happy to be able to return
here.
I haven't said it yet, but it is very
important – the aim of this blog is to stretch my boundaries of
thinking. Imagine, dear reader, the time when you were a child. If
you were a bit like me (and who wasn't?), you thought that the very
important things in your life were your toys – they were bought for
you by your parents, you played with them, you may even have desired
more of them (though I have usually been satisfied with what I had,
again – for various reasons). One of the main reasons I was
satisfied with the toys I had was that when I played with them, I saw
no world around them. Therefore, I saw no other toys. You might laugh
now, and it is great. All truth is great and this truth is the result
of a logical operation in my mind, that started with another truth
about me. You might think I am an honest person now. It's true for
nothing is greater but the truth. However, what is the truth about
you, dear reader? Do you even ask such a question? If you were a bit
like me, then you sometimes experienced something impossible – the
toys which were the center of your world suddenly began to lose their
meaning, as if... boundaries of your little world stretched,
encompassing more and more beautiful things. You might then wanted
another set of toys, unless something totally unexpected happened –
you lost your interest in the toys completely.
Lost interest in the toys completely? I
thought so when I was younger, but is it really true? Isn't it that
we all just have another sets of toys for the rest of our lives?
Something so enbodied in our lives we don't even notice it's there?
Let's see what conditions a toy must meet to be perfect, for only a
toy which is perfect or close to it can be so embodied.
For a toy to be perfect, it must:
1) Shrink our view of the world, so
that the toy appears to be the most important thing. Then, we assume
that the toy is the best thing in the world (notice the confusion
here: the shrinked version of the world is equivalent to the whole
world in the mind of such person).
2) Give a sense of satisfaction, so
that we don't want to play any other game. Because of 1), changing
the game will be impossible until we recognize we are playing a game.
That leads us to the third point.
3) Make impossible noticing it is a
toy. In contrary, the toy appears to be the whole world.
Notice how all three points are
interconnected. Those interconnections, along with the points, make a
toy perfect. So is it logical to conclude that we are all playing the
games in our lives? For me, it is. It is also perfectly allowable to
say that the child plays a game of being a child – being a child is
his perfect toy which he uses to play a game. The child doesn't know
wellhe is a child, i.e., he may not be fully conscious of his childish behaviour. He or she assumes the only game he is
playing is that with his physical toys which means those toys are far
less perfect than his... game of life.
If being a child is a game, then also
being in other times of life is a game. Therefore, it not possible to
not play some game (it turns out we are all heavy gamers). The only logical conclusion is that
life is a game.
Did you notice that we started to
define what life is? Today (as yesterday) people often say: „life
is unfair”, „life is difficult”. How many people on the street
do you meet whose faces are lit up by a completely different, much
more positive thought, e.g. „life is wonderful”? Go outside and
see how many eyes shine because of this thought. I don't see many.
Life is really what me make it.
Does it really say what life IS? Well, no. It is because a language is much more often used to describe day to day, mundane activities and thoughts than much deeper subjects, such as that which we are discussing. In the case of latter, the language becomes more and more difficult to avoid confusion and imprecise statements. What we just said about the life really means: „we decide the outcome of life”.
Does it really say what life IS? Well, no. It is because a language is much more often used to describe day to day, mundane activities and thoughts than much deeper subjects, such as that which we are discussing. In the case of latter, the language becomes more and more difficult to avoid confusion and imprecise statements. What we just said about the life really means: „we decide the outcome of life”.
Imagine that you have a desk in front of you and are sitting
comfortably on your chair. There may even be a night lamp turned on.
On the desk, there are two true statements:
„Life is really what we make it”
and
„We decide the outcome of life”
The second statement is much more true
as it avoids the problems with the language we discussed in the
previous paragraph. The first statement, however,
shows that we often trick ourselves into skipping the definition of
life, as if life was so apparent it didn't need any definition.
Otherwise, it wouldn't be possible to act all the time and associate
the outcome of our actions with the life itself. It is also unfair
for there are people whose outcome of lives are much better than our
outcome. The widely known definitions of life by today's science, are
indeed the results of such omissions. Look at some of those
definitions of life supported by today's science:
„the period from birth to death”
while simple, doesn't explain anything
„the quality that distinguishes a
vital and functional being from a dead body” not only is not
simple, but doesn't explain anything too
„a principle or force that is
considered to underlie the distinctive quality of animate beings”
very complicated. Also notice „principle or force” which are
completely different things. There is also no apparent reason to
conclude that life is a force. „Principle” also doesn't explain
anything.
We can read all 20 definitions of life
in Merriam Webster dictionary and... return to our previous life
which means we didn't really learn the most important thing – what
it is.
To really define a life, let's return
to our most thuthful statement about it:
„We decide the outcome of life”
If this is true (try finding evidence
pointing to contrary, I cannot), this means that life is a greatest
power in the universe. Because it decides, it cannot be decided.
Therefore, it is immortal because nothing can decide for it to die.
The inability to decide anything about life by anything except the
life itself leads us to conclusion that the creation of the universe
was a decision made by life.
This leads to the true definition of
life:
AN IMMORTAL SOURCE OF EVERYTHING,
INCLUDING THE UNIVERSE
However, if life is a source of
everything, then life itself must be... nothing. Yes, you read it
correctly. Otherwise, life would have to create itself which is
illogical, therefore impossible. When I think about it, it is mind
blowing because it means that nothing is the source of everything. It
also is crystal clear when you see that you can't destroy nothing –
nothing always has been and will alway s be. Therefore, nothing
(life) has the power over everything that is.
Let's look further. The title of this
article is „The most important thing life”. The most important
thing in life is life itself (ha, try to refute this one, hint: „set
theory”). Because life is nothing, this means that the most
important thing in life is nothing and the most important thing in
nothing is nothing. If this sound counterintuitive it is because of
the already mentioned inadequacy of the language that becomes the
more apparent, the more important subject it is applied to. When
humans say about nothing, they really mean there is something but
they don't really see it. Here, we are talking about real
nothingness. Although logical, saying that the most important thing
in life is nothing is not very satisfying, therefore we have to look
at the issue from a different angle. Let's try.
THE MOST IMPORTANT THING IN LIFE IS THE
KNOWLEDGE THAT COMES FROM UNDERSTANDING WHAT IT IS.
This is a statement that I have
discovered a few seconds before writing it. Try disproving it, if you
can. Bear in mind you would have to either find an error in my
reasoning, which is possible (as I said, I'm stretching the
boundaries of my thinking meaning I have not reached them yet) or
supply a totally different reasoning (which seems harder for me, but
may not be such for you, depending on your boundaries).
Let's see again. There comes an immense
wisdom from knowing we are an immortal source of everything. As I
said, this implicates the total power over everything. The total
power means a complete wisdom for no one can be wiser than the person
who has the power over everything (I mean real power, not assumed
power such as in the case of politicians who trick people into
thinking they have power, whereas they sometimes don't even know how
to use a computer). This leads us too:
WE ARE THE SMARTEST BEINGS EVER
POSSIBLE
You really are smarter than you have
ever thought. Just to make it clear, imagine an actor who is playing
a stupid blonde so perfectly he forgets who he really is. People
watch movies that show other people making mistakes. An example would
be a soap opera where you probably see people making a lot mistakes
in their lives (I haven't really watched any, sorry). Based on those
mistakes, the story continues. The soap opera would be boring if
every actor played a perfectly smart individual. There would be no
drama, no big emotions, no interested viewers, etc. Because living
beings (humans among them) want the life to be interesting, fun,
emotional, etc., they use their power over everything to decide they
can be imperfect. This comes straight from the statement I already
wrote: „we decide the outcome of life”.
You, however, have the power over
everything, including discovering your real perfectness and this is
why I wrote this article.
I think I will try stretching my
boundaries of thinkning on the subject of life later on for nothing
is more important in life than life itself.
Brak komentarzy:
Prześlij komentarz